Attend All Eight Educational Forums and Become a Fellow!



Do you want to become a Fellow?   Sign-up in advance to attend all eight of our upcoming educational forums in 2017.   Deadline to do so is Friday, February 24th.  Only 15 spots available!  See our schedule below.

What you will receive:

  1.  A "reserved" seat throughout the 2017 educational forum series.
  2. Become an expert! A free education on all presented topics including information on local and NYS policies and laws as they pertain to these subjects.
  3. A certificate of completion from
  4. Two of our "fellows" will be selected randomly to win a free year subscription to a local newspaper of their choice.
  5. ...and perhaps more surprises as we go along.

Write to Rebecca Martin at with " Fellowship"  in the subject line.

For more informationVIEW: Host Eight-Part Educational Forums in 2017. presents
Community Educational Forums 
2017  Schedule

Sunday, Feb. 26th, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART I: On Constitutional Law

A conversation on constitutional law as it pertains to President Donald Trump’s proposed initiatives.

With special guest 
Dr. Lynn Mills Eckert
Associate Professor of Political Science, Marist College

Sunday, March 19th, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART II:  On Climate Change, Energy, and Infrastructure
A conversation on climate change, energy, and infrastructure as it pertains to President Donald Trump’s proposed initiatives.

With special guest
Kate Hudson, Esq.
Waterkeeper Alliance


Sunday, April  30th, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART III: On Immigration
A discussion on the Ulster County Legislature's upcoming Resolution No. 138 "Creating A Policy To Maintain A Safe, Inclusive Government And Ensure The Protection, Order, Conduct, Safety, Health, And Well Being Of All Persons In Ulster County," with guest panelists District 7 Legislator (Kingston) Jennifer Schwartz Berky and Ulster County Sheriff Van Blarcum. Other guests TBA.  The discussion will review this and other local proposals using the guidance provided by Attorney General Schneiderman and the ACLU to help communities understand their rights under the proposed changes in Washington.

With special guests
Jennifer Schwartz Berky
District 7 Legislator

Sherriff Paul J. Van Blarcum
Ulster County Sherriff


Sunday, May 21st, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART IV:  On Public Education
A conversation on public education as it pertains to President Donald Trump’s proposed initiatives.  

With special guests
Robin Jacobowitz, Ph.D.
Director of Education Projects at The Benjamin Center, SUNY New Paltz, Trustee, City of Kingston Board of Education and Executive Committee of Ulster County School Boards Association

James F. Shaughnessy, Jr., Officer
City of Kingston Board of Education

Sunday, July 23rd, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART V:  On Women’s Issues
A conversation on women’s issues as it pertains to President Donald Trump’s proposed initiatives.

With special guests: TBA


Sunday, September 17th, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART VI:  On Economics
A conversation on economics as it pertains to President Donald Trump's proposed initiatives.

With special guest economist and energy analyst Evelyn Wright.


Sunday, October 22nd, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART VII:  On Strategic Organizing:  Looking Forward
A conversation on strategic organizing as it pertains to President Donald Trump’s proposed initiatives. 

With special guest
Callie Mackenzie Jayne
Lead Organizer
Citizen Action of NY
Hudson Valley Chapter

Sunday, November 12th, 2017
From 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
PART VIII:  On Local and NYS Clean Energy
A conversation on local and NYS clean energy as it pertains to President Donald Trump’s proposed initiatives. 

With special guests
Jennifer Metzger, Director
Citizens for Local Power

Pat Courtney Strong, President
Courtney Strong Inc.

Tell Ulster County Legislature That A Proposed Ban on Memorializing Resolutions is Undemocratic.

PETITION:  " A Proposed Ban on Memorializing Resolutions is Undemocratic"

VIEW: Attend next session of the legislature to speak on Wednesday, February 15 at 7:00 pm (arrive at 6:45 pm)

READ:  Resolution No. 32 of February 15, 2017  "Amending The Rules Of Order To Prohibit Memorializing Resolutions"


By Rebecca Martin

A memorializing resolution does not set forth policy or law. Instead, it creates text to cause people to remember. It is a tool to both educate and in this case, to remind us of our principles and values.

So why would members of the Ulster County Legislature want to "prohibit" this critical tool? In our opinion, it is incredibly short sited and potentially damaging to county governance.

"County Legislature Chairman Ken Ronk, R-Wallkill, said he has agreed to co-sponsor a resolution (#32 of 2017) introduced by Legislator Richard Parete to change the body’s rules by banning any resolution in which legislators aren’t taking action on issues directly under their control.  Parete has repeatedly referred to these as a “waste of time.”

Such a ban is rare in legislative bodies.   Memorializing resolutions state a legislative body’s position on an issue that may be outside its purview without taking direct action.  However, they represent a significant opportunity for regional leadership and intergovernmental relationships.

In the past few years, the Ulster County Legislature has passed three memorializing resolutions on the proposed Pilgrim Pipeline and one on the proposed anchorages of crude oil on the Hudson River.  In the last year, the legislature has been unanimous in its support of these statements, which add to the voice of an entire region that stands against these potentially hazardous projects.

Citing the recent use of memorializing resolutions as a “mockery” by the democrats, Chairman Ronk pointed to Legislator Jonathan Heppner’s (D-Woodstock) resolution opposing the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as having not being relevant to county business.  With approximately 20,000 residents now relying on the ACA for their healthcare coverage and the potential loss of $3 million in federal Medicaid funding, this is certainly the business of Ulster County.

Furthermore, do we want to lose the ability to take a stand on things that could severely impact our environment, such as pipelines and anchorages, without adding to the voices in the region who oppose them?"

District 7 Legislator Jennifer Schwartz Berky regarding the proposed ban on memorializing resolutions by the UC Legislature:

Please sign our PETITION and plan to attend the next session of the legislature Wednesday, February 15 at 7:00 pm to speak out on this proposed ban.  Citizens who wish to speak should arrive early at 6:45 pm to sign in be prepared to speak no longer than 3 minutes.   Address: Legislature Chambers, 6th Floor, Ulster County Office Building, 244 Fair Street, Kingston, NY 12401.

WHAT TO EXPECT: Kingston Common Council Meetings in July and Local Law #6 (aka the Rochester Law)



Kingston Common Council Caucus  (Monday, 7/11)
Kingston Common Council Meeting (Tuesday, 7/12)


Caucus:    Conference Room #1   (7/11)
Council Meeting:  Council Chambers  (7/12)
Kingston City Hall
420 Broadway  Kingston, NY  


Caucus:  Monday, July 11th  @ 7:00pm
Council Meeting:  Tuesday, July 12th  @ 7:30pm

Sign-up to speak and secure a seat at the council meeting on 7/12/16  at 7:15pm. 


The Kingston Common Council holds its monthly caucus and council meeting in July.

Local Law #6 (known as the Rochester Law), that proposes clearer requirements for shooting ranges in Kingston. It is a local law that will have its second reading and a full council vote on July 12th.

This event will be filmed and brought to you by thanks to Clark Richters and Kingston News


We encourage the public to attend and to speak on Tuesday, July 12th in support of the council adopting Local Law #6 (the Rochester Law). Local Law #6 emphasizes the creation of important buffers for a business such as a shooting range within our city limits.   

The issue is not about burdening the right to have a gun or to practice using a gun.  Given the potential health and safety issues of a shooting range,  finding the appropriate location for one is key. In our opinion, an appropriate location is NOT inside a densely populated or highly used area. 


The Kingston Common Council will hold its monthly caucus (Monday, July 11th) and full council meeting (Tuesday, July 12th) this month, a week later than normal scheduling due to the July 4th holiday weekend.

Among other important topics that evening, council business will include the second reading and a full council vote of Local Law #6 (known as the "Rochester Law"). This vote is the outcome of months of discussion and debate to properly vet Kingston's current firearms law.

The Common Council will vote on whether it "wants to set specific criteria and restrictions for the opening of indoor shooting ranges in the city, or adopt a simpler approach that does not limit where such facilities could be operated."   (*See below)



The new vetted law (Local Law #6 of 2016) aims to provide clearer regulations for operating indoor shooting ranges in Kingston, including important buffers "that would prohibit any new range from being located within 1,000 feet of the entrance to any school, church, hospital, youth recreational facility or location which, in the opinion of the police chief, would create a nuisance to any nearby resident."   (*See below)


In our opinion, this unvetted law would "allow indoor ranges anywhere in Kingston with Planning Board approval" and should be dismissed.  (*See below)


We encourage the public to attend and to speak in support of the council adopting Local Law #6 (the Rochester Law). Local Law #6 emphasizes the creation of important buffers for a business such as a shooting range within our city limits.     

The issue is not about burdening the right to have a gun or to practice using a gun.  Given the potential health and safety issues of a shooting range,  finding the appropriate location is key. In our opinion, an appropriate location is NOT inside a densely populated or highly used area.  

*Excerpts in quotes from the Daily Freeman  VIEW

WHAT TO EXPECT: Laws and Rules Committee Meeting Tuesday, 5/17/16


Kingston Laws and Rules Committee Meeting 

Conference Room #1
Kingston City Hall
420 Broadway  Kingston, NY  

Tuesday, May 17th, 2016

The council's Laws and Rules Committee will hold their monthly meeting where amending the current Firearms Law is scheduled to be on the agenda.

There is no scheduled public comment period for this meeting. 

This event will be filmed brought to you by thanks to Clark Richters and Kingston News


On Tuesday, May 17th at 7:00pm,  the City of Kingston's Common Council's Laws and Rules Committee will hold their monthly meeting in conference room #1 at Kingston City Hall.  Scheduled to be on the agenda will be a discussion of the amended Firearms Law, which the public expects will be the start of a thorough undertaking, looking closely at all of the items highlighted at a number of public hearings that are posted below. There is no scheduled public comment at this meeting.

Kingston Common Council Caucus and Full Council Meeting (5/2/16 and 5/3/16)

Laws and Rules Committee meeting 4/19/16 Public Comment

City of Kingston Planning Board Meeting Public Hearing 12/14/15

By the way, it was brought to our attention that in 1996, the Kingston Common Council, during a similar contentious debate over a proposed Gentleman's Club on East Chester Street, hired a consultant to prepare a study.  The purpose of the study was  "to determine the potential primary and secondary impacts that may be associated with adult businesses, if such uses were to be established within the City of Kingston. At present, there are no lawfully existing adult businesses within the City."

We believe that this is a model for the Firearms Law, as deserving for the same amount of care. 

Adult Use Study prepared by Greenplan, Inc. 

So it's not the first time that the City of Kingston had to grapple with whether or not a potential business would provide a positive addition or detriment to the community.

Adult Use Zoning Ordinance that followed, and where the study is noted.





Got a Recalled Volkswagen? Donate Your $500 Gift Card to an Environmental Group.


By Rebecca Martin

When we were looking to purchase a car, it was important to us to find not only one from a company that was environmentally friendly, but also in an age of better technology, to purchase a car that had lower emissions while doing better on gas milage.  Of course, an electric car is perhaps the way to go, however the choices currently are limited for what we need,  and very costly too.

So we opted for a Volkswagen (VW) Diesel which promised as we understood it lower emissions and up to 40 mpg + on the highway.

As the world now knows, cars like ours are being recalled. "It's been dubbed the "diesel dupe". In September, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that many VW cars being sold in America had a "defeat device" - or software - in diesel engines that could detect when they were being tested, changing the performance accordingly to improve results. The German car giant has since admitted cheating emissions tests in the US." according to a report by the BBC.

When I first learned of this, I called my dealership in Kingston straight away - requesting to surrender the car. I didn't want to be driving around with an engine "emitting nitrogen oxide pollutants up to 40 times above what is allowed in the US."  But due to it being a lease and with low mileage, I was told that VW wouldn't take ours back. That it was "cheaper to fix a newer model then it was to replace it."

In the meantime, and no one knows how long that will be in America, VW is offering car owners a "Goodwill package" that includes a $500 cash card to spend in any way that they'd like as well as an additional $500 to spend at Volkswagen.  Owners are encouraged to fill out a form online for it to be shipped to your door.

When ours arrived, we were directed to go to our dealership to have the cards activated. So today I made a visit to the one in Kingston where we leased this car.

It was a pleasure to take the opportunity to once again relay how disappointed I was in VW, and to tell them that I wouldn't be purchasing another one of their vehicles in the future on principal.

"Hey, listen," said one of their employees. "they've apologized. Just take the money."  I pointed outside, to the 50 degree weather and downpour on December 17th and said "You don't own me an apology. You owe our environment an apology."  Another employee boasted that sales have been steady regardless of the setback.  I couldn't help but wonder if  that's what $1,000 in gift cards can do - and to me that's nuts. Are we really that easily bought? Marketing is a wonder! Shower us with cash so that we would continue to hold onto our nostalgic impressions (it's that 1970 VW bus that's a killer for me. That and the super beetle).

It occurs to me that there is an enormous disconnect here. We're expected to continue to drive a polluting car while they find a solution - and, in the meantime, to make us feel better as a consumer, we're given a $500 cash card to spend during the holidays?

So what to do.  I believe that at any given moment, we can do better.  In this case, although $500 is a lot of money - what I feel is only right is to donate it to a group/groups who are picking up the pieces for what is an unacceptable and tragically greedy decision (VW is going to pay, too. In more ways than one in my opinion).  There are a handful of noble people who have dedicated their lives to fighting immense battles such as climate change, water and air protection, environmental justice and a whole host of other daunting issues and tasks. Because we rely on them for the work that they do, they are the ones who should be given these resources and more. 

...and so, we challenge those who, like us (and if you can), who are driving around polluting more than we ever intended to in this case and who have received a gift card -  to give the $500 amount to a local environmental group who you appreciate and cherish. Now more than ever they need our support. Furthermore, it's the ethical thing to do.

Tonight, we are making a $250 donation to both Riverkeeper and the Woodstock Land Conservancy.

Join us. Who might you choose?


CALL TO ACTION: Citizen Support Needed TONIGHT (12/15) On Critical Resolutions that includes Microbead Ban, Pilgrim Pipeline, Greenline Project in Kingston.


By Rebecca Martin

THIS JUST IN:  A new public hearing on the Microbead Ban will occur on 1/19/16 and vote by full legislature sometime before the end of January. It has been tabled for tonight. More information coming soon. But please plan to attend to encourage the legislature to pass the remaining three other resolutions. 

For the past month, has been following and working towards the public being more aware of the importance to understand the impacts in Kingston of both the Pilgrim Pipeline and proposed Microbead ban proposal - all up for vote tonight at the Ulster County Legislature Meeting located at 244 Fair Street, 6th floor in Kingston. Public comment will begin at 6:30pm.  * THIS JUST IN: Plan now is for new public hearing on 1/19/16  and vote by full legislature sometime before the end of January. TONIGHT'S vote will only include the below three resolutions. 

We have attached information below on each of the resolutions with some key points for you to research before you speak.  Please keep your speech to 3 minutes or less.

Thank you!

Resolution No. 485 December 15, 2015
- Urging The New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation To Assume Lead Agency Status For The State Environmental Quality Review Process For The Pilgrim Pipeline Project.

In the City of Kingston were our municipality is a lead agency in SEQR for the Pilgrim Pipeline proposal, both the Mayor and Common Council voiced their concern of the Thruway Authority's request as Lead Agency in SEQR.  We were pleased to see our County Executive take the same stance, and now - the Legislature is working towards the same outcome.

It is in our best interest to support the legislature in their efforts here.

READ: Kingston Common Council unanimously rejects Thruway Authority Lead Agency in SEQR request.


THIS JUST IN:  A new public hearing on the Microbead Ban will occur on 1/19/16 and vote by full legislature sometime before the end of January. It has been tabled for tonight. More information coming soon. But please plan to attend to encourage the legislature to pass the remaining three other resolutions. 

Resolution No. 457 December 15, 2015
- Adopting Proposed Local Law No. 14 of 2015, A Local Law Prohibiting The Sale Of Personal Care Products Containing Microbeads In Ulster County.

We are pleased that our legislature is looking to bass a bill prohibiting the sale of ALL personal care products containing Microbeads in Ulster County.

Did you know that companies who advocate for continued use of personal care products containing Microbeads include Proctor and Gamble, Mary Kay and Amway?  Here are some good talking points for this evening:

  • Call on the Ulster County Legislature to pass Proposed Local Law No. 14 Of 2015 “A Local Law Prohibiting The Sale Of Personal Care Products Containing Microbeads In Ulster County”
  • Currently five counties have passed legislation similar to the proposed law for Ulster County. Most recently Albany County became the first in the Hudson Valley to ban the sale of Personal Care Products containing microbeads. Erie, Chautauqua, Cattaraugus, Tompkins and Suffolk Counties have also passed similar legislation.
  • In addition to Ulster County, three more are considering microbead ban legislation. Those counties include Putnam, Niagara, and Monroe. In addition, ban legislation is moving forward in New York City.
  • I support the reasonable phase out period in the proposed Local Law No. 14., offering 180 days for compliance
  • Passing this Local Law to protect our water and health further cements Ulster County’s reputation as a leader in protecting our natural resources.
  • Additionally, voting to approve this bill, sends a powerful message to the State leadership that protecting our water from plastic pollution is a top priority for the citizens of New York State

Plastic microbeads in personal care products

  • Plastic microbeads are an ingredient used in over 100 different personal care products on the market today, including facial scrubs, soaps, shampoos, and even toothpastes.
  • Plastic microbeads are typically used as an abrasive.  However, microbeads are also added to products—such as toothpaste—strictly for decorative purposes.
  • Researchers estimate that a single product can contain as many as 350,000 plastic microbeads.
  • Products with plastic microbeads can be identified (and avoided), when any of the following are listed as ingredients: polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), nylon or Poly(methyl) methacrylate (PMMA).

Microbeads can enter into the environment

  • Products that contain microbeads are designed to be washed down the drain.
  • It is estimated that 19 tons of microbeads enter the wastewater stream in NY annually.
  • Microbeads can enter into waterways through sewage overflows or by passing through sewage treatment plants, which are not designed to remove such tiny particles. 
  • Two-thirds of NY’s sewage treatment plants do not have advanced treatment technology needed to remove microbeads. Of the other one-third of treatment plants that do have some form of advanced treatment, plant by plant analysis would be necessary to determine the efficacy of microbead removal.
  • Microbeads can also pass through septic systems.

Microbeads threaten wildlife and public health

  • Microbeads attract and accumulate toxic chemicals present in the water, including Poly-Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and flame retardants (i.e. PCBs).
  • Microbeads can be mistaken for food and consumed by fish and wildlife.
  • Ingesting plastics can result in reductions in food consumption, stunted growth, and starvation.
  • When fish and aquatic life consume plastic, these chemicals are passed up the food chain to larger fish, wildlife, and ultimately humans.  Exposure to these chemicals is linked to a broad range of ailments, ranging from birth defects to cancer.

Voluntary efforts alone will not solve the problem

  • Safer, non-polluting alternatives (e.g. apricot shells, cocoa beans, pumice, walnut shells) can be used as abrasives in personal care products instead of plastic microbeads. 
  • Some companies, such as Burt’s Bees, never used plastic microbeads in their products
  • Several companies, including Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, L’Oreal, The Body Shop, Unilever, and Colgate/Palmolive, have agreed to phase-out microbeads
  • Some companies have set phase-out deadlines, others have not.  Many others have made no commitment at all.  Voluntary efforts alone will not solve the problem.
  • Even if a company agrees to phase out microbeads, there is no way to ensure that they will switch to a safe, truly biodegradable alternative.

3. U&D RAIL TRAIL Policy 488
Resolution No. 488 December 15, 2015
- Amending Resolution No. 275 Of 2014, Establishing A Policy For A “Rail With Trail” Along The County-Owned Ulster And Delaware Railroad Corridor.

READ: "Kingston Land Trust - Where we stand on R488 - An Amended Policy on Rail and Trail for the U&D Corridor


4. ASHOKAN RAIL TRAIL Planning 480
Establishing Capital Project No. 459, To Provide for Design and Engineering Work for the Ulster County Rail Trail Project along the Ashokan Reservoir (“Ashokan Rail Trail”).

More information coming shortly. 





Water Sales Referendum will appear on the BACK of the ballot in the November 3rd General Election in Kingston, NY.

Screen Shot 2015-10-18 at 10.39.21 PM

Monday, October 19, 2015


A Water Sales Referendum will appear on the back of the ballot in the November 3rd General Election in Kingston, NY. encourages Kingston voters to get out and vote 'yes' on what would be a positive and historic charter revision on the municipal water protection front for the community, and the region.  

Kingston, NY - A Water Sales Referendum to include the Kingston Common Council on all sales of water outside of the City’s corporate boundaries will be on the back of the ballot during the General Election on November 3, 2015.  Polling places are open on that day from 6:00am - 9:00pm.

Over the past year, citizens of Kingston and the region faced a potential threat to its water and watershed during the Niagara Bottling Company’s attempt to purchase a significant share of Kingston’s municipal water supply. During a State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR), it was further revealed that the Kingston Water Board -- a four - five member group appointed by the sitting Mayor of Kingston (who is also a member of the group) -- was independent of City Government and had the sole discretion to approve such a sale. This decision making body’s power excluded Kingston's Common Council and, therefore, all citizens of Kingston from the decision making process.

Through’s unique partnerships, strategic planning and community organizing, Niagara withdrew its proposal after five months of public scrutiny. Since that time, has advocated for a Water Sales Referendum, which would amend Kingston’s City Charter to include Kingston’s Common Council as part of the decision making process for all discussions related to sale of municipal water outside of the City’s corporate limits. As a starting point, amending the City Charter would allow the public opportunities to weigh in on how their water source is used outside of their community.

"Our Common Council unanimously wanted to be included in the decision making process, especially in this day and age," states Rebecca Martin, co-founder of the citizen advocacy group "After Niagara Bottling pulled out in February of 2015, it became obvious that we needed to look closely at the way the law was written and to work to reform the Water Board’s independence.  The sale of our municipal water outside of Kingston needs to be done out in the open and not behind closed doors where only a handful of people decide. In my opinion, the way the recent Niagara proposal was handled was not democratic at all - and ensuring that our water supply is adequate to sustain our communities’ needs looking forward is the most democratic issue that I can think of."

The process to create the Water Sales Referendum was led by Ward 5 Alderman Bill Carey (a Democrat). Carey, who also chairs the Common Council’s Public Safety Committee, where the Referendum was sponsored, agrees.

“Our government is based on elected officials representing the people. The fact that there is currently a disconnect, and that the residents of Kingston have no representation when it comes to selling our most vital resource outside of our community, is a dangerous flaw in our City Charter. Passing this Referendum provides a safety net for Kingstonians, so that we can be represented and our voices will be heard if future proposals that may compromise our water supply should occur. I am very proud to have been a part of the solution to keep the Niagara Bottling Company away from our water, but this Referendum is equally important so the future leaders of our city will have a system in place that allows them to be at the table from the very beginning.”

Minority leader and Ward 9 Alderwoman Deb Brown (a Republican) was one of the early elected officials to question the Niagara Bottling Company’s proposal to purchase up to 1.75 million gallons per day of Kingston’s municipal water supply.

“In today’s world, water is a precious commodity and a resource to be protected. We all have read of droughts across certain areas in North America where communities are hunting for clean water while instituting ongoing conservation efforts. We here in the City of Kingston are fortunate to have a clean and safe water supply readily available for our citizens. As elected representatives of the people, it makes sense that Common Council members have a say when companies who are outside city limits want to purchase our water -- and for what purpose, as well as the amount they may purchase. Currently the Council does not have that right based on a charter written almost a hundred years ago. That power was given to members of a Water Board to oversee all water matters, which worked for those times. They could never have imagined the future with water being bottled and sold for a profit. It is now time to rectify it. All living creatures, all plants, need water to sustain life and we need to protect our natural resource from abuse or profiteering. It is essential for the life and survival of the City of Kingston and for its future generations. As I have said in the past, ‘Water is now the new oil'.”

When asked why passing the Water Sales Referendum is important, Jennifer Schwartz-Berky, chair of’s Policy and Planning Committee and a candidate for Ulster County District 7 Legislator (Kingston), says,  “When Kingston was faced with a decision last year that would have affected our economic and environmental future, you didn’t have a choice. You didn’t have a voice. The City Charter is Kingston’s “constitution.” It is the fundamental structure of our government. New York State Law says that your vote matters on any change to our City Charter. The way the Charter is currently structured, the Common Council elected to represent our community has no say regarding the Water Board’s decision to sell our water. This simply doesn’t make sense. It is not how democracy should work. The Water Board should be accountable to the public and the Council should have the ‘balance of power’ regarding the significant decisions that govern our City’s future.”

The Woodstock Land Conservancy (WLC), one of’s critical partners in educating the public about the Niagara Water Bottling proposal and the sponsor of a recent Watershed Task Force group for the area, also supports the passing of the Referendum.

“This Water Referendum is a crucial step in the process of ensuring that our water remains available to all residents in our area – in the City of Kingston as well as in other municipalities with shared watersheds and water rights – both now and in the future," says WLC's Board Chair Kevin D. Smith. "Requiring Mayoral and Common Council approvals for water sales outside the City of Kingston is a sensible step to improve transparency and sound process – which was lacking with Niagara – to ensure that future water sale proposals are carefully and fully vetted and in the best long term interests of Kingston’s residents and water customers.”

As for what is next for on the municipal water front, Martin is determined.

"There are many questions that need to be answered about water in our area. In the meantime, the public now has a monumental opportunity to vote 'yes' on the Water Sales Referendum. By doing so, it will give the public some protection in the short and long term while our community works together with their elected and appointed officials – and, I hope, with others in our region who are also impacted by Kingston’s stewardship - to address some of what's missing in our current laws to assure the best use of our water supply. It is only in this way that we can do what is best for Cooper Lake as a source of clean water for residents and businesses alike for generations to come."

The Water Sales Referendum will appear on the BACK of this year's ballot during the General Election on November 3rd. 

For more information contact or call 845/750-7295


In Their Own Words: Why Does Passing the Water Referendum on November 3rd Matter.


About is a community-based organization committed to improving the quality of life of Kingston residents through accountability and transparency between the people and their local government. By providing citizens with current and important information through better communication, our work is meant to nurture citizen participation and empowerment through projects, education and fun. sponsors a public educational discussion titled “Water and Waste Water Infrastructure 101” on Tuesday, March 24th sponsors a public educational discussion titled "Water and Waste Water Infrastructure 101" on Tuesday, March 24th from 6:00pm - 8:00pm at the Kingston Public Library, 55 Franklin Street in Kingston, NY.  The group's guest will be Water Resource Specialist Candace Balmer of RCAP Solutions (Resources for Communities and People).

Kingston, NY: is pleased to present an educational discussion titled "Water and Waste Water Infrastructure 101" on Tuesday, March 24th, 2015 at the Kingston Public Library, 55 Franklin Street in Kingston, NY. from 6:00pm - 8:00pm.  Moderated by's Jennifer Schwartz Berky, the group will have the opportunity to speak with Water Resource Specialist CANDACE BALMER to explore water and wastewater infrastructure,  how it is and can be funded, the importance of regular maintenance and the reality of periodic rate increases to keep this huge investment functioning. A question and answer period will also take place.

This event is free to the public and will be filmed by Kingston News. Sponsored by with the support of the Woodstock Land Conservancy, Riverkeeper and Catskill Mountainkeeper.

For more information, contact Rebecca Martin at


Our Guest:

About Candace Balmer, Water Resource Specialist RCAP 

Ms. Balmer joined RCAP Solutions in March 1997 after previous experience as Associate Director, Pollution Abatement Technology Program at Westchester Community College and as Project Engineer with Environmental Resources Management, Inc. (ERM).  Advisory Boards and Task Forces: NY Onsite Wastewater Training Network (OTN); Lower Esopus Watershed Partnership (LEWP); NYC DEP-coordinated Ashokan Reservoir Working Group (ARWG).  Education: A.A.S. Water Quality Monitoring; B.A. Anthropology; M.S. Environmental Engineering.

RCAP Solutions, Inc. is the Northeast regional partner of the Rural Community Assistance Partnership (RCAP).  RCAP is federally funded to assist small rural communities with water and wastewater projects.

Sponsored by:

About is a community-based organization committed to improving the quality of life of Kingston residents through accountability and transparency between the people and their local government. By providing citizens with current and important information through better communication, our work is meant to nurture citizen participation and empowerment through projects, education and fun.

With Support from:

About Woodstock Land Conservancy
The Woodstock Land Conservancy is a non-profit organization committed to the protection and preservation of the open lands, forests, wetlands, scenic areas and historic sites in Woodstock and the surrounding area.

About Riverkeeper
To protect the environmental, recreational and commercial integrity of the Hudson River and its tributaries, and safeguard the drinking water of nine million New York City and Hudson Valley residents.

About Catskill Mountainkeeper
To be the strongest and most effective possible advocate for the Catskill region; working through a network of concerned citizens we promote sustainable growth and protect the natural resources essential to healthy communities.

Niagara Bottling Passes On Town of Ulster Site.



Over the past five months many groups have worked tirelessly across communities and political boundaries to collect important information regarding the proposed Niagara Bottling project. It has always been our aim to encourage a more open process which is critical when decisions are being made about how our public water resources will be managed, used and potentially sold.

The Niagara Bottling Company chose not to pursue a public scoping process and all that it would entail. We respect their decision.  Any impact that we might have made is a reflection of strong resolve, partnerships, commitment, patience and perseverance by us all. It is a great illustration of Democracy at work in the Hudson Valley.

As we shift gears and look forward to what’s next, we fully expect to continue to use our new capacity to advance the public good. There is a lot to do on the subject of water that has been brought to light by this proposal, and it is our goal to help protect this resource and its infrastructure so that it will remain in the hands of the people forever. would personally like to thank our most intimate partners in this work.  Without their time, expertise and courage, the outcome would have certainly been different: The Woodstock Land Conservancy, Riverkeeper and the Esopus Creek Conservancy.

Thank you to Food and Water Watch,, Catskill Mountainkeeper, NYPIRG, The Wittenberg Center, Mid-Hudson Sierra Club, Red Hook Conservation Advisory Council, Clark Richters and Kingston News, SUNY Ulster Environmental Club, Scenic Hudson, Sustainable Saugerties, Slow Food Hudson Valley, Town of Woodstock, Town of Red Hook, City of Kingston Common Council and Conservation Advisory Council, Kingston Transition, Woodstock NY Transition and all of the local businesses who helped to get the word out and host public educational events.

But most of all - thanks to you. The citizens. It is because of you that the outcry for water protection has resulted in a huge win for our communities, the region and the State of New York and a huge opportunity to plan for wise protection, stewardship and management of our critical watersheds and public water supplies as we face the challenges of climate change.

In solidarity as we proceed.

UP NEXT:  Educational panels regarding Water, Infrastructure, Economic Development and more.

MAKING HISTORY: City of Kingston first city in New York State to Adopt Resolution to Oppose Pilgrim Pipeline.


By Iris Marie Bloom

The City of Kingston Common Council unanimously passed a Resolution to Oppose Pilgrim Pipeline. Kingston is now the 8th municipality in the state of New York to take a stand against Pilgrim, joining 22 municipalities in New Jersey.

Councilman Brad Will, who introduced the successful Resolution, said: "This unanimous resolution is consistent with Kingston's Conservation Advisory Committee's position. It protects the environment, residents, and business owners, and allows us to move towards a greener economy." He credited Jen Metzger as the "dynamo" who warned him about Pilgrim. Will provided a map so the Kingston Common Council could see how directly it would threaten Kingston unless is it is stopped.


Kingston would be in the direct path of Pilgrim Pipeline. The five-mile evacuation radius in case of a pipeline explosion would be unmanageable for Kingston. A resident who lives on the Rondout Creek (me) testified last night that "The beautiful Rondout Creek, vital to the City of Kingston in every way, could be devastated by a drilling mud spill during Pilgrim's planned horizontal drilling under the creek. An oil spill on the Rondout, such as the one on the Kalamazoo River, would not only destroy the Rondout Creek but cause health problems for residents and hurt the local economy. The Kalamazoo spill has so far cost $2.5B and counting. Residents there suffered respiratory, neurological and other health impacts from the intense fumes from the Kalamazoo spill."




Making History

Kingston is the first City in the state of New York to oppose Pilgrim, joining the towns of Rosendale and New Paltz, and the Village of New Paltz, which are also in the pipeline's direct path. RochesterRhinebeck, Woodstock, and Marbletown have passed Supporting Resolutions Opposing Pilgrim Pipeline. The two-state total is now 30, a new milestone!

WHAT TO EXPECT: Town of Ulster Town Board Meeting Thursday, 1/8/15 at 7:00pm

By Rebecca Martin

The Town of Ulster Town Board will meet on Thursday, January 8th at 7:00pm.  Although at this time, an agenda has not been posted to their site (we will continue to look for it and update this post when it is up), we expect that the board will have a discussion on the recent change to the SEQR timeline. As you know, it was reported last month that the Chazen Companies, Niagara Bottling's consultant, had requested an additional 30 days to submit their scoping document. Originally, the delivery was to be December 22nd.   It is expected that the board will confirm the date change to January 22nd.

The public may speak at the front of the meeting on matters that are on the agenda, and then given time at the end of the meeting to speak on anything else.



60 Day Public Comment Period

Last December, generated a letter to the Town of Ulster as lead agency requesting a total of 60 days for public input during the public portion of the scoping process. This was due in part to the process start date being December 22nd - January 22nd and in the midst of three major holidays.

The date was reported to be moved to January 22nd, giving the Chazen Companies a total of 60 days to deliver their scoping document.

The public, in turn, wishes for the same courtesy.


Additional Hearings/Locations to Allow Public Input on Draft Scope

Because the proposed project is a complex and multifaceted one that has the potential to impact multiple communities and environmental resources, the public should ask the Town of Ulster to consider more than one public hearing on the scoping document to include locations in Kingston, Woodstock and Saugerties. Additional time and hearing locations in communities that will be potentially impacted would allow for greater public participation and input on the proposed environmental review laid out in the applicant's draft scope.

FOLLOW:  SEQR Pos Dec Review Timeline



We ask that all residents prepare a statement in advance to be no more than 3 minutes in length and to please show respect to municipalities where you are a visitor.

Town of Ulster meetings are generally audio taped, however we will be on hand to to film the event thanks to Clark Richters of Kingston News.

If you have any questions, please contact me at:

Thank you.





Town of Ulster Town Board Meeting

Thursday, January 8th, 2014

Town of Ulster Town Hall
1 Town Hall Road
Lake Katrine, NY

Click on this LINK (coming soon) Host Free Screening of TAPPED in the Town of Ulster, NY.

81pCX2exF9L._SY606_ host free movie screening of “Tapped” in the Town of Ulster, NY on Thursday, January 15th at 6:00pm “Tapped” examines the bottled water industry and its long-term social, economic and ecological effects 

Kingston, NY - with the support of the Woodstock Land Conservancy, Riverkeeper and Esopus Creek Conservancy is proud to sponsor a free screening of the film “Tapped” at the VFW Post 1386 Men's Auxillary at 708 E. Chester Street in Kingston, NY on Thursday, January 15th from 6:00pm - 8:00pm.

Niagara Bottling Company, a national water bottling plant based in California, wants to establish a plant in the Town of Ulster.  It seeks to purchase 1.75 million gallons of water per day from Cooper Lake, Kingston’s municipal water source located in Woodstock, and plans to utilize support from the Start-Up NY Program that gives 10 years of tax abatements to qualifying companies.

Tapped focuses on industry giants PepsiCo and Nestle. The film documents the filmmakers’ visits to a town containing a Nestle factory as well as tests run on the bottles the company uses for its products. These test results showed “several potentially harmful chemicals, some known as carcinogens.” The documentary also focuses on the fraction of bottles that is recycled, noting that “forty percent of bottled water is really just filtered tap water, and every day we throw away 30 million single-served bottles of water.”

The event is free. NO TICKETS ARE NECESSARY. The public will be met by representatives of to answer any questions regarding the proposed Niagara Bottling Company project in Ulster County.

If your school or organization would like to host a screening, please contact Rachel Marco-Havens for more information at

“Tapped” Film Screening Date and Location:

Thursday, January 15th, 2015
VFW Post 1386 Men's Auxillary
Time 6:00pm
708 East Chester Street
Kingston, NY 12401


About is a community-based organization committed to improving the quality of life of Kingston residents through accountability and transparency between the people and their local government. By providing citizens with current and important information through better communication, our work is meant to nurture citizen participation and empowerment through projects, education and fun.

About Woodstock Land Conservancy  The Woodstock Land Conservancy is a non-profit organization committed to the protection and preservation of the open lands, forests, wetlands, scenic areas and historic sites in Woodstock and the surrounding area.

About Riverkeeper   Riverkeeper’s mission is to protect the environmental, recreational and commercial integrity of the Hudson River and its tributaries, and to safeguard the drinking water of nine million New York City and Hudson Valley residents.

About Esopus Creek Conservancy  

  • is to conserve significant natural landscapes
  • in the lower Esopus Creek watershed
  • and in the Saugerties area
  • by protecting the rural character of the environment,
  • by conserving and protecting natural habitats,
  • by promoting biodiversity, and
  • by sharing an appreciation of our natural resources with the community through public outreach, education and advocacy.


Niagara Not Included in Start-Up NY Announcement Today (12/29/14)

The awaited decision from Governor Cuomo was issued today. Two of the five proposals submitted to Start-Up NY by SUNY Ulster were selected, but do not include Niagara Bottling. We are very pleased.

Start-Up NY is a new program, and we've seen multiple announcements made over the last 6 months at participating campuses. Until we hear otherwise, SUNY Ulster's three other proposed businesses at Ulster (that includes Niagara) could be on the table at a later date.

We ask for the public's continued awareness and participation in 2015.

READ the press release from today 12/29/14

Can We Do Better? Asks the SUNY Ulster Board of Directors not to Enter into the Start-Up New York with Niagara Bottling


December 16, 2014

By Jennifer Schwartz Berky

To the SUNY Ulster Board of Trustees, 

I am here with, an organization that now has over a thousand supporters and approximately 25 professionals in a region-wide coalition engaged in our work. (See Introduction to We have been working since 2005 to increase transparency and civic engagement in Kingston, New York through public interest research, educational forums, and working in a non-partisan manner with our elected officials to support open government.

I am an urban planner with many years of experience in economic development and environmental conservation research, policy, and development work. As the Policy and Planning Advisor to Kingston Citizens and a trustee on local, regional and state boards, I am committed to providing well-documented information regarding discussions of public concern.

Your packets contain articles and references to support the statements I am making here today, so that you may evaluate and further discuss the points in this presentation. I and the members of our team are available for further discussion on this issue and welcome your questions.

Kingston Citizens has taken on the issue of the Niagara Bottling proposal because of an unprecedented outcry by residents in Kingston and surrounding communities that will be affected by this proposal. Hundreds of people have attended meetings in Kingston’s City Hall, scores have attended the Town of Ulster’s meetings, and 1,587 signed a petition within a 5-day period objecting to the State’s potential funding of Niagara’s 10.8 million-dollar grant proposal last week.

I have outlined 10 reasons why our organization and our many supporters are asking you not to enter into a partnership with the Niagara Bottling Company as part of the Start Up New York program. In your packets are the key references in this outline. A full folder of the resources we cite is being shared with Ms. Zell and Mr. Katt for your further analysis.

1. Alignment with the College Mission

The Niagara Bottling Company is not an appropriate fit for the SUNY Ulster mission: “SUNY Ulster is a vibrant community of learners distinguished by academic excellence, collaboration, innovation, service, and responsible use of resources.”

With what we present next, we ask you to fully consider whether the Niagara Bottling plant and your Start Up New York proposal are aligned with your mission. Furthermore, this is not an industry that links to SUNY’s educational mission articulated in The Power of SUNY, including 21st century, sustainability-oriented and environmentally-conscious education and job opportunities.

2. Student Goals for Academic Excellence

Students in the United States are increasingly aware of the importance of sustainability in social, environmental and economic terms. The Princeton Review recently reported that over 25% of applicants said that commitment to the environment would “very much” impact their decision on a college or university. The SUNY Ulster students must learn to compete in a global marketplace and, as they have said in their own words, “SUNY Ulster's interactions with the Start-Up NY program, it has the capability to aid in the introduction of sustainable jobs and companies, as well as the potential to introduce unsustainable or environmentally harmful companies to the local area.” They are asking you to work with the former. They want to learn from socially-responsible companies. I hope you want this for them, too.

3. Transparency

The public became aware of the Niagara Bottling proposal several months after it went through several steps that would normally require public disclosure. Chief among these is the provision of water through the Kingston Water Department, whose “will serve” letter was issued, but not made publicly available until FOILed by, despite a potential lack of capacity and a known construction and maintenance decision that would require the assent of the Kingston Common Council, according to our City Charter.

When asked by the SUNY Environmental Club whether the students would have any input into Niagara’s proposed Start Up New York venture with the college, the president told the students that they could not participate in the college’s development of the Start Up New York plan.

4. Known Dangers of the Water Bottling Industry

The water bottling industry has become one of the world’s most wasteful industries. In 2007, when the last federal industrial energy data were published, the industry utilized 32 to 54 million barrels of oil, which is a third of a per cent of total US primary energy consumption. The Pacific Institute estimates that the total amount of energy embedded in our use of bottled water can be as high as the equivalent of filling a plastic bottle one quarter full with oil. Consumption of bottled water has grown 10 percent each year since these data were published. The bottling industry has managed to convince the public that bottled water is safer to drink than tap water. In truth, the industry is hardly regulated at all, with regular reports of contamination in the products. By comparison, municipal water supplies are tested at least hundreds of times per month and have a better safety record than bottled water.

5. Comparison of Costs vs. Benefits

The $10.8 million Regional Economic Development grant proposal, if awarded, would have provided Niagara with $90,000 per job created for 120 jobs and $270,000 per job for 40 jobs. Because the public has not been provided any information regarding the amounts associated with the tax incentives associated with Start Up New York, we are concerned that these are commensurately high in relation to the jobs created. The concept of “opportunity cost” must be considered here. According to the Start Up New York program regulations, here is a 200,000 square foot ceiling on the incentive award. Has the Board of Trustees evaluated other options?   Have you considered what this may prevent our community from doing in the future?

6. Economic Analysis

According the country’s leading economists in regional economic development and regional migration studies, “large incentive packages even when they are risky, unnecessary, damaging to the fiscal future of the locality, displacing, or place extraordinary burdens on constituents to fund future services (Markusen and Nesse 2007). “Companies that least need incentives have the resources to most effectively engage in opportunistic behavior. They cite documented cases where, after large incentives packages had been granted on the presumption of competition, corporate executives admitted that other sites were never seriously considered.” Timothy Bartik and other economists doing labor migration studies, have found that “a sudden increase in jobs as a result of a new plant or plant expansion—indicates that for every 100 new jobs in a region, about 7 will be filled from the ranks of the unemployed, about 16 by drawing existing residents into the labor force, and the remaining 77 from in-migration (Fisher 2004).” That study evaluated numerous cases of tax incentives in different regions, and noted that for “a fairly typical incentive package amounting to a 30% cut in taxes, only 9% of the new jobs arriving in a community will be attributable to the tax cut. The incentives provided to the other 91% are a pure waste of money.”

The leading scholar in this field, Timothy Bartik, has said that only 10 - 40% of jobs in these new industries go to area residents. He is with one of the country's leading think tanks on labor studies, the Upjohn Institute in Michigan.  His work is the basis for my statement that fewer than half the jobs to area residents.  A literature review by economists Partridge and Betz from Ohio State University, who cite Partridge and Rickman (2006), Rowthhorn and Glyn (2006), and others, find that "in the long-term (about 7 years), approximately 80% of the new jobs go to migrants, leaving 20% of the jobs to original residents, with a larger share going to original residents in the short-term."

These economists also find that economic policies such as those being used to justify support for the Niagara Bottling plant "are really aimed to help politicians not residents, these policies slow needed adjustment mechanisms from poor to prosperous regions, and any benefits are dispersed to those who are already economically well off."  The authors conclude that "economists are often highly critical of these policies because they focus on the place and not on the “people”. Economists also suggest such policies may slow the regional adjustment process and that the winners may be wealthy business owners or landowners—not the intended low-income residents (Glaeser, 2008; Pettus, 2006; Polese and Shearmur, 2006; Vigdor, 2007; World Bank, 2009)."

7. State Environmental Law

State agencies are specifically prohibited from funding an action until it has complied with the provisions of a State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) (see section 617.5). Before considering the Niagara Bottling proposal for a Start Up New York tax abatements, we urge SUNY Ulster to allow the full environmental review process to occur so that all its related impacts can be evaluated, including the construction and operation of the plant, the sale of the water, the implications for Kingston's overall water supply, the infrastructure required for withdrawals, and the potential impacts to the water bodies from which Kingston draws its water supplies.

8.  Niagara Bottling Company’s Track Record

  • The Niagara Bottling Company was found to have violated environmental regulations in California and Arizona.
  • Niagara Bottling sued the City of Groveland, Florida – with a population of just over 7,000 residents — which had to spend more than $1.4 million in its battle with Niagara and had to settle for $1.24 million credit toward sewer-utility payments and pay some other costs for the company. Niagara can use as much as 200,000 gallons a day in sewer service from Groveland for as long as seven years without being charged, which is among the most expensive of municipal services in any community.
  • Niagara employees, current and past, in plants across the country, have logged dozens of complaints about the company’s lack of training, safety procedures, criteria for performance its high turnover, forced overtime, and corporate culture of favoritism. If this were one plant, or just a few employees, we would not share these with you, but these reports came from several locations.
  • Industry reports show that – among the 90+ job categories at Niagara – many of the jobs, particularly in labor (not management) lower-paid than other employers in this industry. We are providing these for you in the digital file to Ms. Zell.
  • TheBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS is my source for the claim of lower pay and injury/illness at bottling plants. They issued several reports on this problem. Your packet has a page from a BLS report on this.

9. Your Role as Trustees

According to SUNY’s “Statement on the Governance Role of a Trustee or Board Member,” trustees or board members:

“…must act in good faith and exercise the degree of diligence, care, and skill that an ordinary prudent individual would use under similar circumstances in a like position. To conform with this standard, trustees and board members should:

  • Regularly attend and participate in board meetings and committee meetings where applicable;
  • Read, review, and inquire about materials that involve the institution, especially board minutes, annual reports, other reports, plans, policies, and any literature that involves the institution;
  • Have a fiduciary responsibility for the assets, finances, and investments of the institution and exercise due diligence, care, and caution as if handling one’s own personal finances; and
  • Use one’s own judgment in analyzing matters that have an impact on the institution.”

Among these fiduciary responsibilities, “When matters of fiscal governance become very technical and require greater expertise in assessing the fiscal condition of the institution or its long-term well-being, a board should seek the advice of experts.” Examples of this include:

  • Assessing any risk associated with the validity and reliability of financial data; and
  • Monitoring compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the institution’s operations.

10.  Leadership

Today, your students are asking you to make a commitment to exert leadership in your decisions regarding your relationship to Niagara Bottling. In order for Ulster County to give its students the tools to compete in our global market, they need to learn not only skills or to be trained in specific tasks. They need role models whose decisions reflect a respect for the public good and for the protection of our public resources. They deserve to see our leaders hold themselves to the highest standards and show that they are striving for the best opportunities they can secure for them.

Surely we can do better than this. We can evaluate proposals with a more inclusive process, one that is based in science and economics, and we can show our community that we want to fulfill a mission of academic excellence, collaboration, innovation, service, and responsible use of resources.”

Again, we are at your disposal to discuss this further. Thank you for your time and consideration.


Specific References

Bartik, T. J. (2012), The Future of State and Local Economic Development Policy: What Research Is Needed. Growth and Change, 43: 545–562. doi: 10.1111/j.14682257.2012.00597.

Fisher, Peter. 2004. “The Fiscal Consequences of Competition for Capital.” Prepared for the Conference “Reining in the Competition for Capital” Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota February 27-28, 2004

Glaeser, Edward L. and Joshua D. Gottlieb. 2008. "The Economics of Place-Making Policies." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity:155-239.

Gleick, P.H. and H S Cooley, “Energy implications of bottled water” Environmental Research Letters Volume 4 Number 1

Markusen, Ann, and Katherine Nesse. 2007. "Institutional and Political Determinants of Incentive Competition." In Reining in the Competition for Capital, Ann Markusen, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, pp. 1-42.

Partridge, Mark D. and Dan S. Rickman. 2006. “An SVAR Model of Fluctuations in U.S. Migration Flows and State Labor Market Dynamics” Southern Economic Journal 72(4):958-980.

Pettus, Ashley. 2006. "Rethinking New Orleans." Harvard Magazine, January/February, Available at:

Polese, Mario and Richard Shearmur. 2006. "Why Some Regions Will Decline: A Canadian Case Study with Thoughts on Local Development Strategies." Papers in Regional Science 85(1):23-46.

Renkow, Mitch. 2003. "Employment Growth, Worker Mobility, and Rural Economic Development." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2):503-513.

Rodriguez-Pose, Andres. 2010. "Economic Geographers and the Limelight: Institutions and Policy in the World Development Report 2009." Economic Geography 86(4):361-370.

Rowthorn, Robert and Andrew J. Glyn. 2006. “Convergence and Stability in U.S. Employment Rates.” The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics: Contributions in Macroeconomics 6(1).

World Bank. (2009) Reshaping economic geography. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.


General References on Sustainable Development

Anderson, Ray C. Confessions of a Radical Industrialist: Profits, People, and Purpose—Doing Business by Respecting the Earth. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2009.

Bartlett, Peggy F. and Chase, Geoffrey W. (eds.). Sustainability on Campus. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.

Beavan, Colin. No Impact Man: The Adventures of a Guilty Liberal Who Attempts to Save the Planet, and the Discoveries He Makes About Himself and Our Way of Life in the Process. New York: Picador, 2010.

Benyus, Janine M. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York: William Morrow & Co., 1997.

Brown, Lester R. Plan B: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble. New York City: W. W. Norton & Co., 2003.

Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.

Cox, John D. Climate Crash: Abrupt Climate Change and What It Means for Our Future. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 2005.

Daly, Herman. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.

Farrell, James J. The Nature of College. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions, 2010.

Friedman, Thomas L. Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution—and How it Can Renew America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008.

Green Building and LEED Core Concepts. Second Edition.

Gore, Al. Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009.

Hawken, Paul. Blessed Unrest. New York: Penguin, 2008.

Hawken, Paul. The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability. New York: Harper Collins, 2010.

Katz, Greg. Greening Our Built World: Costs, Benefits and Strategies. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2010.

Martin, James and Samels, James E. (eds.). The Sustainable University: Green Goals and New Challenges for Higher Education Leaders. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.

McDonough, William and Michael Braungart. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press, 2002.

Meadows, Donnella. Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books, 1972.

Orr, David W. Earth in Mind: On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1994

Royte, Elizabeth. Garbage Land: On the Secret Trail of Trash. New York: Little, Brown, 2005.

Worldwatch Paper #170: Liquid Assets: The Critical Need to Safeguard Freshwater Ecosystems

July 2005
Sandra Postel
ISBN: 1-878071-76-9
78 pages

By taking advantage of the work that healthy watersheds and freshwater ecosystems perform naturally, cities and rural areas can purify drinking water, alleviate hunger, mitigate flood damages, and meet other societal goals at a fraction of the cost of conventional technological alternatives.

But because commercial markets rarely put a price on these "ecosystem services," and because governments around the world are failing to protect them, they are being lost at a rapid rate. Global warming is the wild card that could further exacerbate the impacts of human activities on the natural systems that safeguard our water supply—impacts that include falling water tables, shrinking wetlands, vanishing species, and a decrease in both the quality and quantity of available freshwater.

"The biggest enemy is tap water," said a Pepsi VP in 2000. "When we're done, tap water will be relegated to irrigation and washing dishes," said Susan D. Wellington of Quaker Oats, the maker of Gatorade. But its more than just words: Coca-Cola has been in the business of discouraging restaurants from serving tap water, and pushing "less water and more beverage choices."

Read MORE 

Niagara and SUNY Ulster? Petition Created by SUNY Ulster Students. Please consider signing!


"He (SUNY Ulster president Donald Katt) was very focused on the economic benefits....If you're going to be sustainable, you need to be culturally sustainable. You need to be economically sustainable and you need to be environmentally sustainable."

Click on the image to view SUNY Ulster Students speak on the community college's collaboration with Niagara.



"How can you say that we are going to create internships and assure jobs for students when we aren't being taken into account"

Click on link to view more video.