Hudson Valley Air Quality Coalition to Host UCRRA for Q&A on Proposed Anaerobic Digestion Facility on February 26


WHAT

Hudson Valley Air Quality Coalition hosts Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency Executive Director Marc Rider to discuss proposed $100m + put or pay anaerobic digestion facility

WHERE
Virtual and open to the public

WHEN
Thursday, February 26 at 6:00pm

HOW
Zoom in: tinyurl.com/fxn8uk4r

Hudson Valley Air Quality Coalition (HVAQ) will host Marc Rider, Executive Director of Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency (UCRRA), at its February 26 virtual meeting for a public question-and-answer session regarding the proposed anaerobic digestion facility open to all.

HVAQ raised serious concerns about the proposed facility. The plan relies on mixed-waste inputs, increasing the risk of contamination in compost and soil amendments. Proposed “put-or-pay” contracts could lock the County into decades of disposal obligations, limiting its ability to reduce waste over time. The project includes injecting biomethane into the existing fracked-gas system, raising climate concerns, and its high capital costs could divert funding away from proven Zero Waste strategies such as reduction, reuse, repair, recycling, and source-separated composting.

In January, the Hudson Valley Air Quality Coalition (HVAQ) urged the Ulster County Legislature and the Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency (UCRRA) to pause consideration of an anaerobic digestion facility until Ulster County completes and publicly releases a Zero Waste Implementation Plan (ZWIP).

This request echoes a January 8 letter from a coalition of partners to Ulster County. Before investing in this costly new waste infrastructure, the County should complete and publicly adopt a comprehensive Zero Waste Implementation Plan that clearly outlines how it will achieve its stated Zero Waste goals.

HVAQ will host Marc Rider, Executive Director of UCRRA, at its February 26 virtual meeting for a public question-and-answer session regarding the proposed anaerobic digestion facility open to all. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m., with Mr. Rider expected to join around 6:45 p.m. following the Environmental Health Project presentation.   Zoom link: tinyurl.com/fxn8uk4r

Public Comment Period Opens for Alcazar (TerraGen) Battery Storage Project; Public Hearing Scheduled for February 23

On February 5, 2026, the Town of Ulster Town Board began a 60-day review period for the Draft Scope of Work for the Alcazar Energy Storage System Battery Project proposed at the Coleman High School site at 430 Hurley Avenue. This action initiates the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) scoping process, which assesses potential environmental impacts and identifies ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate those impacts. Written comments may be submitted any time prior to March 10th at 5pm (when the public process for the scope closes) to the Supervisor at ul**************@*************ny.gov or in-person to the Supervisor at Town Hall.

A public hearing will be held on Monday, February 23, 2026, at 6:00 pm at Town Hall in Lake Katrine. Comments made at this session become part of the official record for the project and will be considered in shaping the scope of the environmental review.

This stage of the SEQR scoping process is the time to evaluate whether the studies proposed so far are adequate or incomplete. Scoping determines which environmental issues must be studied in detail before the project can move forward. Community members are encouraged to review the Draft Scope of Work carefully to identify what is missing, what needs further study, and what questions remain unanswered.

Community members may wish to comment on issues such as:

  • The impacts of siting the project next to a residential neighborhood

  • Whether alternative locations or site layouts should be studied

  • Potential impacts on environmental justice communities

  • Fire safety risks and emergency response planning

  • Impacts to water resources

  • Light and noise pollution

  • Traffic and transportation impacts

  • Effects on local wildlife and natural resources

Community members are encouraged to place their concerns on the record at the February 23 public scoping hearing, and may also submit written comments through the end of the 60-day scoping period.

We also have prior experience with the SEQR scoping process, including helpful materials from an earlier project. While the project itself was different, the scoping process is the same, and the lessons learned still apply. Resources from that effort include a video and PowerPoint presentation explaining SEQR and the scoping process, prepared for the Lincoln Park Power Plant Project, as well as draft scoping comments submitted by residents and coalition partners. That process also included a public comment brainstorming session, which helped community members think through their concerns, identifying missing studies and prepare effective comments for the official record.

To find all studies relevant to the scoping process for TerraGen/Alcazar:

  1. Visit Town of Ulster Public Information page
  2. Scroll down to find “Large Scale Proposed Projects”
  3. Click on “Alcazar Energy Storage System, LLC”

 

Questions and Answers Regarding the Scoping Session

If the public wishes to send written public comment for the record on 2/23, what time will it have to get into by on that day?  Would they send those comments to you at this address?
Written comments may be submitted any time prior to March 10th at 5pm to the Supervisor via email or in-person to the Supervisor at Town Hall.

Does the 60 calendar-day scoping process end on April 6?  Just flagging that that is Monday following Easter Sunday.  It wouldn’t hurt to have a little more time so folks aren’t having to jam over the holiday weekend.
The public has until March 10th at 5pm to submit written comments on the draft scope. The 60-day reference in the Town Board’s February 5, 2026 resolution relates to the maximum timeframe within which the Lead Agency, upon receiving a draft scope by an applicant,  must adopt a final scope under 6 NYCRR Part 617. That 60-day timeframe is not the length of the public comment period itself.

Can the public provide comments to you right up until the final day of the scoping process?  What time do those need to be delivered by on that day, and do those comments all apply to the record like those delivered on the 23rd?  What is the difference?
The public has until March 10th at 5pm to submit comments on the draft scoping document. The public cannot provide comments right up until the final day of the scoping process. Written public comments received after the public scoping session and before March 10th will be treated the same as the comments received at or before the public scoping session on February 23, 2026.

Will members of the public be allowed to speak, or is the session for written comment only?
Members of the public can speak, with a timer set to three minutes per speaker.

Will questions be allowed or just statements?
This will not be question-answer period, but expressions of what you believe is an environmental impact to be studied.

Who will be taking the comments?
Representative(s) of LaBella (project planner) will be present to receive comments, along with the town board.