By Rebecca Martin
At last week’s Town of Ulster Workshop meeting, we learned that the Town of Ulster Town Board as Lead Agency did not submit the Final Scope to Glidepath (the applicant) to make the April 2nd deadline. What happened?
DEC Requests Additional Air Quality Review and Comments.
In the DEC’s Commissioner Policy #29 Environmental Justice and Permitting, the “policy amends the DEC environmental permit process by identifying potential environmental justice areas; providing information on environmental justice to applicants with proposed projects in those communities; enhancing public participation requirements for proposed projects in those communities; establishing requirements for projects in potential environmental justice areas with the potential for at least one significant adverse environmental impact; and providing alternative dispute resolution opportunities to allow communities and project sponsors to resolve issues of concern to the community.”
City of Kingston’s Got Skin in the Game.
In the the City of Kingston, there are two “Potential Environmental Justice Areas“. One in Uptown and in the Rondout, downwind of potential emissions produced by the gas-fired power plant that is being proposed.
“If the air data indicates that the project’s potential impact area includes the Potential Environment Justice Area the applicant will be required to incorporate environmental justice into the permitting process and prepare a public participation plan as described in the attached environmental justice fact sheet.” state officials wrote.
In the Daily Freeman, it was reported that the other comments about the environmental review of the project from the state include:
- Finding that the project is located within an area of potential historical or archeological significance and may have visual impacts on the Hudson River National Landmark Historic District.
- Requesting an evaluation of whether the project is consistent with the state energy plan and suggested the developer consult with the state Department of Public Service.
- Noting that the project site has the potential for a “high abundance and diversity of amphibians and other vernal pool associated wildlife.” State officials added that there are also potential impacts on habitat for the Northern Long-eared and Indiana bats due to planned tree removal.
- A reminder that some of the property appears on federal wetlands maps and that the developer will need to conduct surveys to establish precise boundaries.
DAILY FREEMAN “Town of Ulster gets Two additional weeks to frame review of proposed electric generator”
Rescheduled Balloon Tests Monday, April 9th at 8:00am.
“Town of Ulster Supervisor James Quigley noted “that developers have agreed to find a way to conduct balloon tests that will accurately reflect the proposed height of emission stacks for the project. Tests attempted on Thursday were aborted early because balloons were popping when blown into trees, with the balloons that were seen above the tree line actually flown at 128 feet instead of the anticipated 100-foot height of planned stacks.” (Daily Freeman)
In a letter submitted to the Town of Ulster alerting the town of rescheduled Balloon Tests:
The Project sponsors plan to fly a five (5) foot diameter weather balloon at a height of 80 feet to simulate the height of the exhaust stack of the proposed Lincoln Park Grid Support Center. The balloon flight is tentatively scheduled for Monday April 9th at 8AM and is weather dependent. If winds or weather conditions are not favorable, this work will be rescheduled. It is anticipated that a red balloon will be flown at 80 feet and a yellow spotter balloon at 100 or 120 feet- all subject to field conditions.
This work will aid the Town in evaluating the potential visual impacts of the proposed facility located on property located between Frank Sottile Boulevard and Miron Lane. The site is identified on Town of Ulster Tax Map as Section 48.12 Block 1 Lot 20, Section 48.16 Block 1 Lot 1, and Section 48.16 Block 1 Lot 2.210.
Once the balloon is up, it will remain aloft for approximately two hours (again subject to weather conditions) to allow project representatives to photograph the balloon from sites within a five (5) mile radius of the site.
Receptors for visual analysis include the following locations based on the draft scope and a public document. One of our coalition partners, Scenic Hudson, suggests that members of the public near the following locations at the time of the balloon tests to please take and submit photos and impressions to email@example.com
- View from Hudson Valley Mall on Frank Sottile Boulevard;
- Not sure where the best place would be.
- View from westbound lane of the Kingston Rhinecliff Bridge;
- Cannot stop on the bridge. Maybe the consultants have obtained permission.
- View from Tivoli Bay State Unique Area;
- Suggested Poet’s Walk Park instead.
- View from Dutchess County Route 103 in vicinity of Ryan Road;
- Not sure if Ryan Road is the best spot. May be too far south.
- View from Lucas Avenue near Town-City boundary;
- This is too far. Only the plume would be an issue.
- View from NYS Route 209 in the vicinity of NYS Route 28;
- Possibly relevant. Plume would certainly be an issueÂ
- View from eastern shore of Hudson River looking toward project site;
- Rhinecliff waterfront park is the most likely location. Unless they drive north along the RR. Scenic Hudson will cover this
- View from Van Kleeck Lane (Between Quail Dr. and Ledge Road)
- Important location. Residents should be aware. Scenic Hudson will also check.
- Other critical receptors identified during balloon test;
- We should all be looking for the balloons from important places in the community
- Other locations of significance;
- Poet’s Walk Park
- Scenic Hudson will be there
- Ferncliff Fire Tower
- Scenic Hudson will be there
- Poet’s Walk Park