On Municipal Policy.


By Rebecca Martin

Lately, and historically in fact, Kingston Government has had a conflict with department behavior and the public’s expectation. Without clear policy in place, we rely on common sense behavior – and that can be quite subjective when things go astray.

About 6 years ago in the City of Kingston, a city employee filed a sexual harassment suit against the supervisor and a few other employees at the DPW.  Their behavior that was widely publicized was despicable. To add insult to injury, the public learned that the COK didn’t have a Sexual Harassment policy in place, creating more concern. The cost of which felt by city taxpayers. Could the whole thing have been avoided?

Today, we are reading about city workers using their social media accounts in inappropriate ways in the headlines where policy is in place but clearly not adhered to. Conflicts of Interests are more common than not even though Ethics and all that it embodies are written into code.

With only a little bit of research, when we enter in ‘small city municipal policies’ what comes up is the different forms of government that include City Manager. No surprise.  1/3rd of small cities like ours have changed to incorporate it.

But given Kingston’s affinity to ‘strong mayor’ form of government (which is really new. Only 20+ years old) and which can and that we feel should be challenged and potentially changed (to city manager form of government), what we are searching for is what a municipality of our size and given our form of government generally does in the way of policy.

On first glance, Section 3: Village Operations: “Chapter 13: The importance of written policies and procedures” they state that “If your municipality is small or if it operates under a relatively close-knit management (which ours does), policies may be ‘understood’…..relying on ‘understood’ policies, however, may lead to misunderstandings.”

To us, city policies matter.  Could the city of Kingston create a policy manual? According to our initial reading here, and elsewhere a policy manual would be most helpful, as a ‘well written, up-to-date policy manual guides managers and supervisors in making decisions, training and handling employment issues that relate to safety and health. A policy manual also offers other less obvious benefits such as: 1) A basic communication tool; 2) An excellent training resource. 3) A written documentation. 4) Saves time and manages complex operations. 5) Gives employees a right to know’

City Government’s role is infrastructure which is broad. It includes water and sewer pipes, roadways, signage, communication, contracts and all else that makes those living and doing business in Kingston easy.  And that’s really it. I see Kingston government treading on the historic, the arts and other places one might say they haven’t any business and takes away from what it is meant to do.

There is no lack of important details that need attention in Kingston’s City Government. It may be a big effort initially, but it will make things run smoothly and more efficiently in the long run.

2 thoughts on “On Municipal Policy.”

  1. The need for policy is perfect… the need for city manager is not…
    Policy can be enacted now. You have basically a totally non performing “city manager” in James Noble, as an alderman at large, who Kingston Citizens has witness first hand a refusal to lead. Indeed, just recently we say the Alderman at Large compaining in a letter to the Kingston Times that he, James Noble, gets no respect… wait for it…. from the government of Kingston!
    Instead of a petulant vendetta against some imperious actions by this mayor, run a campaign for an alderman at large.
    But wait, a city manager doesn’t come from Kingston! It comes from outside: there you might have a point… finding and electing the talent for Kingston to run itself when one has to draw only from KIngston! No wonder! (Well, we did have Hayes Clement and Andy Levin as choices… powerful talents, and we got neither!_
    We could do like the School District has and hire a super suited talent from out side to do to Kingston what Padalino has done for the Kingston High School!.
    There is no demonstration that City Manager is a Panacea… failure are rife.
    However, clearly, Kingston Citizens has real staying power: witness the protection offered by its work on Niagara Water…
    Not clear our friends in Woodstock could be called to help…. but OK…
    When could this happen? Can we get this in in a year? Will Steve Noble run on a platform to commit to a city manager referendum?

  2. Jim Noble is not an example of City Manager Form of Government. He is an Alderman-at-Large as you know and his role is in concert with a Strong Mayor form of Government which is what we unfortunately have.

    As you know, it would be unconstitutional to impose qualifications on any elected official and it’s my opinion that experienced people with a background in public administration (i.e. qualifications) to run a city this size and manage an estimated $36 million dollar budget should be mandatory in the executive office. Furthermore, for a hiring process to be in or outside of city limits within reason in my view is a very good thing. Casting a net for the most qualified candidate for Kingston. Look at Beacon. Meredith Robson doesn’t live there. Look at how wonderful of a job she is doing.

    To change a form of government would require a desire by those at the helm, a great deal of education and then for the majority of the community to want to do so. It’s a long, but worth while process no matter the outcome. The public should come to better understand how its government runs anyway, no matter what form it is or chooses.

    – R. Martin


Leave a Comment